Commentary: Epidemiology and futurology--why did Rothman get it wrong?
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Commentary: When the cameras disappear: acute stress and suicide.
Public Health]. Selvmord i Danmark—Markant fald i selvmord, menstigende antal selvmordsfprsøge, Hvorfor? [Suicide in Denmark—a decrease in suicide completion but a increase in suicide attempt, why?] København: Kailow Graphic A/S, 2005 (in Danish). 10 Greenland S, Lash TL, Rothman KJ. Concepts of interaction. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (eds). Modern Epidemiology. 3rd edn. Philadelphia,...
متن کاملHow textbooks (and learners) get it wrong: A corpus study of modal auxiliary verbs
Many elements contribute to the relative difficulty in acquiring specific aspects of English as a foreign language (Goldschneider & DeKeyser, 2001). Modal auxiliary verbs (e.g. could, might), are examples of a structure that is difficult for many learners. Not only are they particularly complex semantically, but especially in the Malaysian context ...
متن کاملCommentary: Is epidemiology really dead, anyway? A look back at Kenneth Rothman's 'The rise and fall of epidemiology, 1950-2000 AD'.
1 Rothman KJ. The rise and fall of epidemiology, 1950–2000 AD. New Engl J Med 1981;34:600–02. 2 Rothman D. Strangers at the Bedside: A History of How Law and Bioethics Transformed Medical Decision Making. New York: Basic Books, 1991. 3 Wildavsky A. Searching for Safety. New Brunswick (USA) and London: Transaction Books, 1988. 4 Doll R, Peto R. Causes of Cancer. London: OUP, 1981. 5 Proctor RN. ...
متن کاملA comparative study of interpretative methods in conciliating purity and wrong of the prophet Dawood
Commentator`s interpretative methods is known as one origin for Shiite and Sunni difference in Quran commentaries. Commentators, when interpreting the verses 22-26 of chapter Suad, differ in conciliating prophet Dawood`s purity and wrong. Surveying Shiite and Sunni`s commentary methods comparatively, the paper has intended to study the origins of commentator`s differences. To do so, some Shiite...
متن کاملCommentary: the prevention paradox in lay epidemiology--Rose revisited.
'It has long been a commonplace observation in the discipline of social anthropology that cultural systems of explanation or accountability [for the occurrence of a misfortune] need to address two distinct issues. In the first place the general kind of misfortune: how and why does it happen? In the second place, the site and time of particular misfortune require explanation: how and why did it ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- International journal of epidemiology
دوره 36 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007